Blogger's Corner - Fracking News

New Yorkers protest fracking as Obama's EPA declares their fears unfounded New Yorkers protest fracking as Obama's EPA declares their fears unfounded

Report downplays frac sand link to health troubles

By Eric Lindquist 11 February, 2016

EAU CLAIRE, Wis. — A major study of the potential health effects of industrial sand mining in western Wisconsin concludes the industry is unlikely to have a negative impact on most residents. The report indicates that harmful health effects are unlikely to result from the frac sand industry's influence on air quality, groundwater quality and land reclamation.

The health impact study, released Tuesday by the nonprofit, nonpartisan Institute for Wisconsin's Health, indicates that harmful health effects are unlikely to result from the frac sand industry's influence on air quality, groundwater quality and land reclamation.

"The panic around the health impacts is a bit moderated by this report," said Lieske Giese, director of the Eau Claire City-County Health Department, a partner in the study. "There is good evidence that there are unlikely to be health impacts related to some of the factors that some people are really worried about."

Audrey Boerner, health impact assessment specialist with the institute, said she doesn't know if the results will quiet critics who have expressed concerns about the danger from inhaling fine sand particles or from potential groundwater contamination by the industry, but she stressed that authors strived to create an unbiased report based on science.

"We found that a lot of the environmental issues that are brought up between community members and in the media really don't have a scientific basic for potential health impacts," Boerner said.

But Crispin Pierce, director of UW-Eau Claire's environmental public health program, said Tuesday he believes the study ignored important air quality data collected by university students at sand mining sites at Bloomer, New Auburn and Augusta during the past 18 months.

The students used an instrument validated by the U.S. Army but not certified by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to assess the prevalence of extremely tiny airborne particles that can get into deep lung tissue and cause a range of serious health problems, Pierce said. The health impact study focused on levels of larger silica particles.

"I was disappointed because I felt like our data was kind of sidelined, and it's the only work that looked at these fine particles," Pierce said. "As a scientist, I want to look at all the information we have available and put together what we know about the risk at that point, and I don't think they did that."

The study states that data collected at several facilities in the Upper Midwest do not indicate that health-based standards have been exceeded with regard to respirable crystalline silica.

After a long history of emotional debate about the impact of sand mining in the region, Giese said, she hoped some residents would take comfort in one of the study's primary conclusions: "The air you breathe is not likely to be a huge issue."

As for the potential effect on water quality, Chippewa County conservationist Dan Masterpole said the study did a good job of addressing potential environmental concerns, which the county attempts to limit through permit conditions and ongoing work with mining companies.

The study did find that health effects are possible from changes to groundwater quantity in certain areas, and the industry could have negative health consequences for some people because of stress and anxiety related to the impact of mining on property values, marketability of land and quality of life issues such as traffic, light and noise.

The Institute for Wisconsin's Health collaborated with 15 governmental health departments, the University of Iowa's Environmental Health Research Center, sand mining industry representatives, expert reviewers and community members over the past year to gather and analyze information. The participating health departments were in Barron, Buffalo, Chippewa, Clark, Dunn, Eau Claire, Jackson, La Crosse, Monroe, Pepin, Pierce, Rusk, St. Croix and Trempealeau counties, along with the Ho-Chunk Nation.

The assessment was supported by a grant from the Health Impact Project, a collaboration of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and The Pew Charitable Trusts.

Additional Info

Last modified on Wednesday, 02 March 2016 14:36
Eric Lindquist

Eric is a special projects editor with the Leader-Telegram news team since 1999. Always in pursuit of a good story, Eric has won national awards for investigative, enterprise and sports reporting and state awards for investigative, enterprise, spot news, feature, public service, business, environmental and sports reporting.

Related items

  • Fracking isn't contaminating groundwater, study finds

    Fox News Aricale

    A major anti-fracking argument by environmentalists may not have the facts to back it up, according to a new study conducted by Du ...

  • EPA Finds No Widespread Water Pollution From Fracking

    Americans could be forgiven for thinking fracking poses an inherent threat to groundwater.

    The anti-fossil fuel “Keep It in the Ground” movement has waged a multimillion-dollar campaign to convince the public of that exact claim, even though there has never been any evidence to support the accusation.

  • America can double its oil production, says fracking pioneer Harold Hamm

    U.S. drillers have the ability to double the country's oil production to 20 million barrels a day, but doing so too soon would tank oil prices, Continental Resources CEO Harold Hamm said Thursday.

    Hamm, who made his fortune by pioneering new drilling methods in North Dakota's Bakken Formation, did not offer a timeline for when this would be possible, but it would certainly be a difficult task. Surging U.S. production since 2008 was largely responsible for creating a global oversupply of oil that sent prices spiraling from more than $100 a barrel to $26 this past winter.

  • Steelworkers' union Community backs fracking in UK
    "Support for Fracking in the U.K. gaining support among trade unions."

    The main steelworkers' union has backed plans for fracking in the UK.

  • Clinton Doubles Down Against Fracking in Debate, Raising Alarms

    Hillary Clinton’s promise during a debate Sunday to aggressively regulate fracking deepens the divide between Republican and Democratic presidential candidates on oil and gas development and signifies her continued shift to the left on environmental issues.

    In the Democratic presidential debate in Flint, Michigan against Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders, Clinton said she wouldn’t support fracking in states or local communities that don’t want it, if it causes pollution, or if the chemicals used aren’t disclosed.

    "By the time we get through all of my conditions, I do not think there will be many places in America where fracking will continue to take place," Clinton said.

Login to post comments

About Pattison

The Pattison family has, for their entire 60-year history, consistently proven their commitment to their customers, employees, their community and the environment.

Read more icon

Contact Information

We would be delighted to hear from you.  Feel free contact us any time.
Pattison Sand Company, LLC
701 1st Street
Clayton, IA 52049
  (563) 964-2860
  This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Pattison Sand Company, LLC.

Site design by JLMorgan

Employee Center

Our employee center provides instant access to Human Resources Forms & Documents, company event information, announcements and schedules.